Hi Luca,
  ok, thanks. I totally misunderstood the option then. --iface-id is
maybe more suitable for my needs. However, I have to probably split
cento to two instances as I don't see how I could specific iface-id if
run only one instance of cento. e.g. cento -i fge1 -i fge2. But I think
that cento -i fge1 --iface-id 5:7 and cento -i fge2 --iface-id 6:7 will
work.

M.

On 01.12.2017 15:08, Luca Deri wrote:
> Matej
> it applies to the MAC address of the packets received by cento, not to the 
> MAC of the NIC receiving them
> 
> Luca
> 
> 
>> On 1 Dec 2017, at 10:55, Matěj Grégr <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Luca,
>>  it's mirrored traffic. Does --if-networks option apply only for
>> traffic originated/received by the machine?
>>
>> M.
>>
>> On 12/01/2017 10:40 AM, Luca Deri wrote:
>>> Matěj,
>>> the problem of -b is that the rest of the CLI was not parsed.
>>>
>>> What type of traffic did you attach to fge1? Is traffic
>>> originated/received by the machine or is traffic mirrored to it? Can you
>>> please check this?
>>>
>>> Thanks Luca
>>>
>>> On 11/23/2017 09:42 PM, Matěj Grégr wrote:
>>>> Hello Luca,
>>>>  hm, I don't see any difference. I tried to run cento from command line
>>>> using the following command:
>>>>
>>>> cento -p /var/run/cento-fge1.pid -t 30 -d 20 -9 x.x.x.x:9999 -i fge1
>>>> --syslog cento -D 0 --if-networks 68:05:CA:34:89:C0@5,68:05:CA:34:89:C1@6
>>>>
>>>> fge1 driver has MAC 68:05:ca:34:89:c0, thus it should be set to 5.
>>>> However, I still see input and output interface set to 1 and 2.
>>>>
>>>> Tried also with --if-networks @cento-networks
>>>> # cat cento-networks
>>>> 68:05:CA:34:89:C0@5
>>>>
>>>> But without success.
>>>>
>>>> M.
>>>>
>>>> On 21.11.2017 14:13, Luca Deri wrote:
>>>>> Hi Matěj,
>>>>>
>>>>> please change
>>>>>
>>>>> D=0
>>>>> --syslog=cento
>>>>> -b *<=== REMOVE*
>>>>> --if-networks=68:05:CA:34:89:C0@5,68:05:CA:34:89:C1@6
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> (remove -b)
>>>>>
>>>>> and it will work
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards Luca
>>>>>
>>>>> On 11/20/2017 05:21 PM, Matěj Grégr wrote:
>>>>>> Hello Luca,
>>>>>>  I tried to use the following cento.conf:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> # cat /etc/cento/cento.conf
>>>>>> -p=/var/run/cento.pid
>>>>>> -t=30
>>>>>> -d=20
>>>>>> -9=x.x.x.x:9998
>>>>>> -i=fge1
>>>>>> -i=fge2
>>>>>> -g=0,1
>>>>>> -G=2,3
>>>>>> -D=0
>>>>>> --syslog=cento
>>>>>> -b
>>>>>> --if-networks=68:05:CA:34:89:C0@5,68:05:CA:34:89:C1@6
>>>>>>
>>>>>> M.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 20.11.2017 12:17, Luca Deri wrote:
>>>>>>> Matej,
>>>>>>> can you please share the flow command line  you are using?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Luca
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 18 Nov 2017, at 21:21, Matěj Grégr <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>> following and older thread:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 10.02.2017 14:54, Luca Deri wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Hi Jesse
>>>>>>>>> please see below
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 02/10/2017 02:08 PM, Jesse Alexander wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> First issue:
>>>>>>>>>> We are using cento to send netflow to multiple collectors for 
>>>>>>>>>> analysis. The nbox server has 4 pairs of TAP interfaces (8 NICs). We 
>>>>>>>>>> are sending as version 5 netflow, which has a field for the 
>>>>>>>>>> interface.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Bytes 12-13, and 14-15 in the flow record
>>>>>>>>>> 12-13 | input | SNMP index of input interface
>>>>>>>>>> 14-15 | output | SNMP index of output interface
>>>>>>>>>> All of the flow packets are coming through with either "1" or "2" 
>>>>>>>>>> for those values, which is causing problems with our Kentik service 
>>>>>>>>>> and an internal collector.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> It appears this has been brought up before, but there isn't a 
>>>>>>>>>> solution mentioned.
>>>>>>>>>> http://www.ntop.org/support/faq/how-do-i-set-the-input-and-output-interface-id/
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> How do we get cento to correctly report the interface ID?
>>>>>>>>> In the current cento (devel) you can do
>>>>>>>>> --iface-id <in>:<out>                   | Set input/output interfaceId
>>>>>>>>> in exported flows
>>>>>>>>> where
>>>>>>>>> - interface indexes and (router) MAC/IP addresses
>>>>>>>>>   Flag --iface-id is used to specify the SNMP interface identifiers
>>>>>>>>> for emitted flows.
>>>>>>>>>   However using --if-networks it is possible to specify an interface
>>>>>>>>> identifier to which
>>>>>>>>>   a MAC address or IP network is bound. The syntax of --if-networks 
>>>>>>>>> is:
>>>>>>>>>   <MAC|IP/mask>@<interfaceId> where multiple entries can be separated
>>>>>>>>> by a comma (,).
>>>>>>>>>   Example: --if-networks "AA:BB:CC:DD:EE:FF@3,192.168.0.0/24@2" or
>>>>>>>>>   --if-networks @<filename> where <filename> is a file path containing
>>>>>>>>> the networks
>>>>>>>>>   specified using the above format.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It doesn't work for me. I have the same issue as Jesse - all flows from
>>>>>>>> cento are exported with if interface 1, out interface 2.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I mirror traffic from router to the following two interfaces on cento 
>>>>>>>> box:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 3: fge1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,PROMISC,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq
>>>>>>>> state UP mode DEFAULT qlen 1000
>>>>>>>>   link/ether 68:05:ca:34:89:c0 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
>>>>>>>> 5: fge2: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,PROMISC,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq
>>>>>>>> state UP mode DEFAULT qlen 1000
>>>>>>>>   link/ether 68:05:ca:34:89:c1 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I tried to set the interface indexes to 5 and 6 using:
>>>>>>>> --if-networks "68:05:ca:34:89:c0@5,68:05:ca:34:89:c1@6"
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> However, I still see only 1 for incomming and 2 for outgoing index in
>>>>>>>> flow data:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Flow Record:
>>>>>>>> Flags        =              0x00 FLOW, Unsampled
>>>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>>> input        =                 1
>>>>>>>> output       =                 2
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Running cento --version
>>>>>>>> v.1.3.171116
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Any idea what I am doing wrong?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>> Matej
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> Ntop mailing list
>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>> http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Ntop mailing list
>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>> http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Ntop mailing list
>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>> http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Ntop mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Ntop mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Ntop mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ntop mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ntop mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop
> 

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

_______________________________________________
Ntop mailing list
[email protected]
http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop

Reply via email to