Well I've tried just about all the combinations I can think of plus the ones 
recommended below and none of them are working.  Based upon what I have read on 
TCPDUMP and the supported exceptions there are a number of ways to exclude a 
machine from being monitored but they are not working in the Windows version.  
So that begs the question as to whether there is a different way to call the 
parameters in the Windows version than in the *nix versions that would work.  
I've tried calling NTOP from the command line using the various command line 
options and no matter what command I put in it comes back as saying 
unrecognized command.  Of course I only tried the –w and –B parameters but 
those are fairly straight-forward.

Any other thoughts on this because without being able to exclude certain 
machines I'm afraid I've just spent dollars on something that will not work in 
my environment.  Shame on me for not testing more thoroughly first but it is 
what it is.  :-)  Besides I REALLY, REALLY like the product so I'd like to 
figure this out.

Thanks for the assistance.

Jeff

From: Jeff Schrunk <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Reply-To: <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2011 14:39:47 +0000
To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: Re: [Ntop] Exclude Certain Machines from Monitoring

I will give that a try Jesse and see how it goes.  Thank you both for 
responding.

Jeff

From: Luca Deri <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Reply-To: <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 21:21:39 +0100
To: <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: Re: [Ntop] Exclude Certain Machines from Monitoring

Jesse
I think this is the best solution for excluding hosts/networks from being 
monitored

Regards Luca

On Jan 14, 2011, at 9:19 PM, Jesse Bowling wrote:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi Jeff,
An off-the cuff answer would be to try using the not in front, i.e., "not host 
server1.domain.com and not
server2.domain.com" or perhaps "not (host server1.domain.com or host 
server2.domain.com)"...Perhaps it's as simple as
that, perhaps not...
Just a thought,
Jesse
On 01/14/2011 02:18 PM, Jeff Schrunk wrote:
Pardon me if I'm posting this to the wrong list and it should go in Misc.
I'm a recent user and registrant of NTOP and I need to exclude certain machines 
from monitoring for various business
reasons.  I have the FQDN for the machine but the IP address will change from 
time to time as a static IP for these is
not possible.
On the Preference Page on the Basic settings for the –B option I have been 
putting the following (using example names
below):
Capture Filter Expression (-B):  "host not server1.domain.com 
<http://server1.domain.com> or server2.domain.com
<http://server2.domain.com>"
I've tried various iterations of this from changing the or to and and removing 
the quotes to a number of different
options to no effect.  I found one page on the internet using Google that talks 
to this:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg06298.html
However, trying their options has not worked either.  The examples in the 
manual are all about watching a specific host
versus excluding so I could really use some help.
I'm running this under Windows XP Professional on a scaled down machine (no 
other apps running/dedicated to NTOP) to
just run NTOP.  Any suggestions?
Thank you very much for your time.
Jeff
_______________________________________________
Ntop mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop
- --
Jesse Bowling
_______________________________________
Incident Response Manager          |~~|
Office of Information Security     |\/|
University of Georgia              |^^|
(706) 542-2127                       |/\|
jesseb at uga dot edu                 |~~|
- ----------------------------------------
No matter that we may mount on stilts, we still must walk on our own
legs. And on the highest throne in the world, we still sit only on our
own bottom. -Michel de Montaigne
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Red Hat - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAk0wr7kACgkQ5E4CHL/YJ2oV+QCgr548k09oNLsOle+MuujVvjLo
tFoAn0fLq1cMY3S3JyOnqsfpRfvpH/ds
=JY+h
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Ntop mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop

---

"Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place. Therefore, 
if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are, by definition, not 
smart enough to debug it. - Brian W. Kernighan

_______________________________________________
Ntop mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop

_______________________________________________ Ntop mailing list 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop
_______________________________________________
Ntop mailing list
[email protected]
http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop

Reply via email to