Hi Felix please make sure your application is not linking the wrong pfring library (not sure if you are using static or dynamic linking), I do not see any other possible reason.
Best Regards Alfredo > On 16 Nov 2017, at 11:25, Felix Erlacher <[email protected]> wrote: > > Dear All, > > I am trying to use the pfring zc drivers and libraries to speed up > packet capturing for a network analysis application. > After using the newest version of the pfring driver from the github repo > (using make install and the load_driver script), I wanted to switch back > to a stable branch, namely 7.0.0-stable. I removed every file related to > pfring (and pf_ring and ixgbe) and also checked manually if all libs and > drivers are removed. Than I switched to the stable branch, and rebuild > and reinstalled kernel modules, libs and drivers. Now, all of the > included userland applications ([pf,z]count among others) report that I > am using PF_RING 7.0. Also cat /proc/net/pf_ring/info shows me I am > using 7.0.0. > > The problem is that my application reports I am still using PF_RING > 7.1.0 (in the "no valid license...demo mode" message). I did recompile > the application from scratch after the pfring reinstall process. > Does anyone have any hint why my application thinks I am using PF_RING > 7.1.0 altough I only have 7.0.0 modules, libs and drivers installed? > > For the record: > I am using Ubuntu 16.04.3 with kernel 4.4.0-98-generic and Intel 82599ES > NICs with ixgbe drivers. > > thanks and regards, > > Felix > _______________________________________________ > Ntop-misc mailing list > [email protected] > http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
_______________________________________________ Ntop-misc mailing list [email protected] http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc
