Another question related to the same issue:

I wonder why the design is that the application responsible for
managing/allocating the rule_id, and not the infrastructure.
I would expect the API just to ask to add a rule, and the infrastructure
will return 2 parameters:
1. Success/Failure
2. The allocated rule_id in case of success (that will be used for removing
the rule)

Thanks

On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 8:34 PM, Amir Kaduri <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi,
>
>
>
> I would like to clarify a point regarding sw hash filtering rules and the
> purge idle feature:
>
> In my application, I’m using sw hash filtering rules to block sessions.
> For that purpose, I’m using the API pfring_handle_hash_filtering_rule()
> to add and remove rules.
>
> When adding a rule with an ID of a rule that that has been already added,
> this “add rule” action fails. This means that the application’s
> responsibility to manage the rule IDs.
>
> In other words, the application’s responsibility to know which IDs are in
> use and which are not, if it wants to avoid trial-and-error every time a
> rule should be added.
>
> On the other hand, there is the API pfring_purge_idle_hash_rules() that
> can assist in removing (purging) hash filtering rules that are inactive for
> a while, automatically.
>
> So the situation is that pf_ring purges a filtering rule, and the
> application is not aware of it.
>
>
> For this reason:
> 1.       The application continues to keep the relevant rule-id, assuming
> it’s still active.
> 2.       The application avoids using this rule-id for filtering other
> sessions, since it assumes it’s still occupied.
> 3.       If the session suddenly revives after the purge period arrives,
> the application is confused since it’s not clear to it how come packets are
> forwarded while there is an active rule.
>
> The above happens since there is no notification mechanism to the
> userspace application, that a rule has been purged (removed).
>
>
> Is the description correct or maybe I miss something critical in the APIs
> usage?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Amir
>
_______________________________________________
Ntop-misc mailing list
[email protected]
http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc

Reply via email to