No it should be the same (I assumed that you were using the community edition)
please file a bug on github and assign it to Emanuele who is taking care of these issues luca On 11/15/2016 10:19 AM, Peter Shute wrote: > I'm using Pro Small Business Edition. Is that different to the Pro version > you're referring to? > > Peter Shute > > Sent from my iPad > >> On 15 Nov. 2016, at 6:55 pm, Luca Deri <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Peter >> in the pro version we use a different library where the problem you >> reported doesn't appear >> >> If you have a patch to share, please send us a pull request and we'll >> consider its inclusion in ntopng >> >> Regards Luca >> >>> On 11/15/2016 01:33 AM, Peter Shute wrote: >>> Charts are displayed in several places in ntopng's web interface. I find >>> these difficult to interpret beyond a one day date range because of several >>> problems: >>> - It doesn't display the dates on the time axis. >>> - The times are relative to the current time, so they aren't whole hours. >>> - The chart appears to always be divided into the same number of segments, >>> so the interval between segments isn't a whole number of hours. >>> - A cosmetic issue, but if I scale the display (in Firefox), at some scales >>> some of the divisions disappear. >>> >>> E.g I'm looking at a 1 week chart now, and the values on the axis are >>> 11:19:00, 21:13:20, 11:06:40, etc. It makes it hard to even tell where each >>> day begins. >>> >>> Looking at the webpage source, I found this function: >>> function getTickFormat(diff_epoch) { >>> var tickFormat; >>> >>> if(diff_epoch < 86400) { >>> tickFormat = "%H:%M:%S"; >>> } else if(diff_epoch < 2*86400) { >>> tickFormat = "%b %e, %H:%M:%S"; >>> } else { >>> tickFormat = "%b %e"; >>> } >>> >>> return(tickFormat); >>> } >>> >>> That looks to me like it's supposed to display the date and time if the >>> range is over a day, and just the date if it's over 2 days. But the only >>> use of that function in the page source is: >>> var tickFormat = getTickFormat(0); >>> >>> Is this variable scale format a feature that was never fully implemented? >>> >>> Peter Shute >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Ntop-misc mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Ntop-misc mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc > _______________________________________________ > Ntop-misc mailing list > [email protected] > http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc _______________________________________________ Ntop-misc mailing list [email protected] http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc
