Hi Gautam
your traffic is GTP traffic and the hash was computed on the inner headers when 
present,
I did change the behaviour computing the hash on the outer header when using 
cluster_per_flow_2_tuple, and introduced
new hash types cluster_per_inner_* for computing hash on inner header, when 
present.
Please update from github or wait for new packages.

Regards
Alfredo

> On 10 Nov 2016, at 11:41, Chandrika Gautam <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> 
> Hi Alfredo 
> 
> PFA the traces having vlan and not vlan.
> 
> To add more details to this, there are 2 observations - 
> 1. We ran a bigger file of 1 lakh packets, out of which fragments of same 
> packet got distributed across application
> 
> 2. We ran with the attached file and observed that the 2 packets were going 
> to one application and rest of the packets were to other one.
> 
> Thanks & Regards
> 
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 4:04 PM, Alfredo Cardigliano <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> Hi Gautam
> could you provide a pcap we can use to reproduce this?
> 
> Alfredo
> 
> > On 10 Nov 2016, at 11:22, Chandrika Gautam <[email protected] 
> > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > We are using PFRING cluster feature and using cluster_2_tuple and 2 
> > applications
> > are reading from same cluster id.
> >
> > We have observed that the packets having same source and destination ip 
> > addresses are getting distributed across 2 applications which has 
> > completely tossed our logic as we are trying to assemble the fragments in 
> > our applications.
> >
> > Is there any bug in PFRING clustering mechanism which is causing this.
> >
> > Using PFRING 6.2.0 and  pfring is loaded with below command -
> > insmod pf_ring.ko min_num_slots=409600 enable_tx_capture=0
> >
> > I tried with this also.
> > insmod pf_ring.ko min_num_slots=409600 enable_tx_capture=0 
> > enable_frag_coherence=1
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> > Gautam
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Ntop-misc mailing list
> > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> > http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc 
> > <http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ntop-misc mailing list
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc 
> <http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc>
> 
> <multiple_fragments_id35515.pcap><multiple_fragments_id35515_wo_vlan.pcap>_______________________________________________
> Ntop-misc mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc

_______________________________________________
Ntop-misc mailing list
[email protected]
http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc

Reply via email to