Hi Georg,
On Wed, 15 May 2013 00:09:22 -0600, Georg Duffner <g.duff...@gmail.com>
wrote:
I’d prefer to stay with the AFF syntax which is well established.
I wonder if the latest, virtually frozen FontForge supports the current
AFF syntax or still uses an earlier version. Before AFF was complete
George added the missing functionality but Adobe did not accept his
additions. The former luatex support was probably based on George's
modifications to the AFF syntax.
Hans and Taco know better, but I suppose a newer implementation of AFF in
mkiv could be done in lua without touching the binary.
But anyway, this may very well be beyond Hans' current plans for font
trickery, but it's fun to discuss possibilities.
Best wishes
Idris
--
Professor Idris Samawi Hamid
Department of Philosophy
Colorado State University
Fort Collins, CO 80523
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
