Am Sun, 11 May 2025 13:49:49 +0200 schrieb juh+ntg-context--- via ntg-context:
> Dear all, > > this was a very interesting thread, thanks a lot. > > After your recent discussion about accessibility I poke around a little > and found that LibreOffice is doing a nice job. I was quite surprised as > I rarely use it. I randomly created some documents, exported to pdf and > tested against verapdf. They all validate. (I am tempted to use > LibreOffice for some small pdf documents we publish on our website.) Passing validation doesn't garanty accessibility. If a figure has no alternative text, validation for UA-1 will fail. But if all your figure have as alternative text "blablablub", it will pass. > > Accessibility is a hard job and people like me are happy if some > validators are showing green success lines. But you never know, if it > really makes things better. Well you can test that. Get nvda and then let the PDF read to you. > With this I only get one error: > Specification: ISO 19005-2:2011, Clause: 6.2.4.3, Test number: 3 ISO 19005 is about PDF/A, Archivability. That has nothing to do with accessibility. You must call verapdf with the -f switch and choose ua-1, ua-2, wt1r, or wt1a if you want to validate accessibility. (assuming that you have a current verapdf). -- Ulrike Fischer http://www.troubleshooting-tex.de/ ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / https://mailman.ntg.nl/mailman3/lists/ntg-context.ntg.nl webpage : https://www.pragma-ade.nl / https://context.aanhet.net (mirror) archive : https://github.com/contextgarden/context wiki : https://wiki.contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
