On Fri, Jan 3, 2025 at 19:06 (+0100), Henning Hraban Ramm wrote: > Am 03.01.25 um 18:07 schrieb Jim: >> I have made some edits to the wiki here and there when I got (more or less) >> definitive statements from someone who I assumed is a ConTeXt "guru" (or >> higher), or when I was correcting some typo or grammar error, or when I >> added an example I thought was enlightening. In this case, the edit is >> major, and I would not want anyone to feel I was stepping on anyone's toes >> by rewriting the examples in the framed page.
>> Has anyone who has read this far care to comment on the wiki questions: >> (1) Why does \over work correctly in the \framed wiki example, and >> (2) Should the example there be re-written to use preferred ConTeXt syntax? > As you can see on its start page, Had I only known or thought to look! Thanks for the pointer. > the ConTeXt installation of the wiki is 2024.01.08, i.e. one year > old. Since then, most of the math rewrite happened. (If Taco finds the > time, it would make sense to update.) > There’s a lot of outdated code in the wiki, since it started in MkII times, > and it’s not always obvious that something is outdated. Quite true. > Besides, users have different styles of coding… There is that. But style is one thing, and wondering why something in the wiki won't work at all is yet another. > But yes, please, if you see something outdated/oldfashioned/overly > convoluted, change it if you know how! And if not, please ask to make those > who know aware. See my next message... Cheers. Jim ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / https://mailman.ntg.nl/mailman3/lists/ntg-context.ntg.nl webpage : https://www.pragma-ade.nl / https://context.aanhet.net (mirror) archive : https://github.com/contextgarden/context wiki : https://wiki.contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________