Am 08.09.24 um 12:12 schrieb Wolfgang Schuster:
Hans Hagen via ntg-context schrieb am 28.08.2024 um 20:18:
On 8/28/2024 5:06 PM, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote:
There’s also the scite module that uses SciTE’s lexers for syntax
highlighting. The builtin highlighters are limited to TeX/ConTeXt,
MetaPost, Lua and XML.
They are actually just lpeg lexers that we made for use in scite so no
scite installation is needed.
Which highlighter should extended when support for additional languages
is needed, the built-in one or the scite version?
The scite module doesn’t support escaping, and the TeX highlights of
both are conflicting. It would be nice if that could be fixed.
(I need the scite highlighters for e.g. bash and escaping in TeX
highlighting, ATM I can’t have both.)
Hraban
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl /
https://mailman.ntg.nl/mailman3/lists/ntg-context.ntg.nl
webpage : https://www.pragma-ade.nl / https://context.aanhet.net (mirror)
archive : https://github.com/contextgarden/context
wiki : https://wiki.contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
