On Sat Feb 8, 2025 at 2:58 AM JST, Zhi Wang wrote:
> There can be multiple cases of handling the GSP RPC messages, which
> are the reply of GSP RPC commands according to the requirement of the
> callers and the nature of the GSP RPC commands.
>
> Some GSP RPC command needs a new reply policy: "caller don't care about
> the message content but want to make sure a reply is received". To
> support this case, a new reply policy is introduced.
>
> Introduce new reply policy NVKM_GSP_RPC_REPLY_POLL, which waits for the
> returned GSP message but discards it for the caller.
>
> No functional change is intended.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhi Wang <z...@nvidia.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/include/nvkm/subdev/gsp.h | 1 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/gsp/r535.c | 3 +++
> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/include/nvkm/subdev/gsp.h
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/include/nvkm/subdev/gsp.h
> index c467e44cab47..bc16510261b8 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/include/nvkm/subdev/gsp.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/include/nvkm/subdev/gsp.h
> @@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ typedef void (*nvkm_gsp_event_func)(struct nvkm_gsp_event
> *, void *repv, u32 rep
>
> enum {
> NVKM_GSP_RPC_REPLY_RECV = 1,
> + NVKM_GSP_RPC_REPLY_POLL,
> };
>
> struct nvkm_gsp {
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/gsp/r535.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/gsp/r535.c
> index bc8eb9a3cb28..af2836cca38f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/gsp/r535.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/gsp/r535.c
> @@ -601,6 +601,9 @@ r535_gsp_rpc_handle_reply(struct nvkm_gsp *gsp, u32 fn,
> int reply,
> else
> repv = msg;
> break;
> + case NVKM_GSP_RPC_REPLY_POLL:
> + repv = r535_gsp_msg_recv(gsp, fn, 0);
> + break;
> default:
> repv = ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> break;
I suspect patch 4 can be merged into this one, so we introduce the user
at the same time as the functionality.
