https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104441
--- Comment #4 from Mauro Rossi <[email protected]> ---
Hi Ilia,
thanks for your responses.
Also in my understanding, which is not professional but more of an hobbyist,
the drm planes model considered in drm_hwcomposer may have considered rotation
property as available in its first implementations/test cases.
IMHO since having no rotation is equivalent to having 0 rotation only,
I don't see the reason for drm_hwcomposer to throw the error in
drmplane.cpp:123, unless being born as an hwcomposer HAL and having a strong
requirement for it (or to "fake it").
Also I wanted to get your feedback, which is in line with KMS documentation,
that rotation property can be optional.
Thanks for your hint, drm_hwcomposer is now part of freedesktop.org
https://cgit.freedesktop.org/drm_hwcomposer
but I could not find how to submit a bug for drm_hwcomposer in bugzilla.
I think it should not be in 'DRI' section and it should not be in 'Mesa'
Mauro
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Nouveau mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau
