On 4 January 2016 at 14:56, Martin Peres <[email protected]> wrote: > On 17/12/15 19:18, Martin Peres wrote: >> On 29/11/15 16:10, Martin Peres wrote: >>> >>> This is an oversight that made use of the trip-point-based fan managenent >>> on >>> cards that never expose those. This led the fan to stay at fan_min. >>> >>> Fortunately, the emergency code would kick when the temperature would >>> reach >>> 90°C. >>> >>> Reported-by: Tom Englund <[email protected]> >>> Tested-by: Tom Englund <[email protected]> >> >> >> Tested-by: Daemon32 <[email protected]> >> Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92126 >> >>> Signed-off-by: Martin Peres <[email protected]> >>> --- >>> drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/bios/fan.c | 1 + >>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >>> >>> diff --git a/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/bios/fan.c >>> b/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/bios/fan.c >>> index 43006db..80fed7e 100644 >>> --- a/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/bios/fan.c >>> +++ b/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/bios/fan.c >>> @@ -83,6 +83,7 @@ nvbios_fan_parse(struct nvkm_bios *bios, struct >>> nvbios_therm_fan *fan) >>> fan->type = NVBIOS_THERM_FAN_UNK; >>> } >>> >>> + fan->fan_mode = NVBIOS_THERM_FAN_LINEAR; >>> fan->min_duty = nvbios_rd08(bios, data + 0x02); >>> fan->max_duty = nvbios_rd08(bios, data + 0x03); >>> >>> >> >> Ben, can you merge this patch? It is kind of critical :s And it should be >> CCed to stable too, without it, some kepler/maxwell get 0% fan power which >> is kind of dangerous, even without reclocking! > > > Ping, this is really important :s > Not sure who picked it up, but it seems to be in the latest fixes batch [1].
[1] http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2015-December/097589.html -Emil _______________________________________________ Nouveau mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau
