Hello! I have very old distributive (RedHat 7.2, kernel 2.4.8-20). One important program works on it with graphical user's interface. (X11 works, KDE works.) But this hard disk (IDE) is very old. Due of that my task now is to clone this system to another (more modern, SATA) hard disk. I have connected to this motherboard new disk (SATA) with Windows-7. I have download from the official RedHat's site the most similar distributive (Enigma, kernel 2.4.7-10) and created a virtual Linux-machine under Windows-7. When installing RedHat's distributive I have selected "Skip X configuration" because my videocard was absent in card's list. But X11 is needed for work. I tried to install X11 from rpm-packet from this distributive Enigma: rpm -ivh XFree86-Servers-3.3.6-42.src.rpm Packet is installed, config file XF86Config is created, but I changed it by the same file from disk-original. Now when I type "startx" I get messages: (EE) VESA(0): No matching modes ................................. (EE) Screen(s) found, but none have a usable configuration. Fatal server error: no screen found ................................. and X-server doesn't start. So I have one system which works and the second system which doesn't work. On the same hardware. Please, help me by hints: 1). what I did wrong? 2). what should I do now? Thanks. P.S. My videocard is named GV-N430OC-1GL and I tried to find Linux-drivers for it. There are only enough modern drivers (for kernel 2.6) on the NVIDIA's site. I think nobody will make drivers for kernel 2.4 now. Due of that what driver I should to use? VESA? SVGA? VGA?
>Вторник, 29 декабря 2015, 12:00 -08:00 от >[email protected]: > >Send Nouveau mailing list submissions to >[email protected] > >To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit >http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau >or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to >[email protected] > >You can reach the person managing the list at >[email protected] > >When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific >than "Re: Contents of Nouveau digest..." > > >Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: Breakage with nvif? (Karol Herbst) > 2. Re: K2200 Special Setup Question (Pekka Paalanen) > > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >Message: 1 >Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2015 21:40:23 +0100 (CET) >From: Karol Herbst < [email protected] > >To: Ben Skeggs < [email protected] >, Ilia Mirkin < [email protected] > >Cc: [email protected], Ben Skeggs < [email protected] > >Subject: Re: [Nouveau] Breakage with nvif? >Message-ID: >< 500109625.189890.1451335223510.javamail.open-xcha...@www.ud-mail.de > >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > >I messed up keeping my branch up to date, so this is solely my fault > >> Ilia Mirkin < [email protected] > hat am 28. Dezember 2015 um 18:54 >> geschrieben: >> >> Hi Ben, >> >> Karol and Tom are seeing this on init with a nvif-enabled kernel + >> libdrm. What are we doing wrong? I think that route == >> NVIF_IOCTL_V0_ROUTE_NVIF (== 0), while owner is apparently 1, whatever >> that is. >> >> [362619.242238] nouveau: glxgears[6096]:00000000:00000000: ioctl: size 32 >> [362619.242240] nouveau: glxgears[6096]:00000000:00000000: ioctl: vers >> 0 type 00 object 0000000000000000 owner 00 >> [362619.242241] nouveau: glxgears[6096]:00000000:00000000: ioctl: nop size 8 >> [362619.242242] nouveau: glxgears[6096]:00000000:00000000: ioctl: nop vers 0 >> [362619.242242] nouveau: glxgears[6096]:00000000:00000000: ioctl: return 0 >> [362619.265957] nouveau: glxgears[6096]:00000000:00000000: ioctl: size 72 >> [362619.265959] nouveau: glxgears[6096]:00000000:00000000: ioctl: vers >> 0 type 02 object 0000000000000000 owner 01 >> [362619.265959] nouveau: glxgears[6096]:00000000:00000000: ioctl: route != >> owner >> [362619.265960] nouveau: glxgears[6096]:00000000:00000000: ioctl: return -13 > > >------------------------------ > >Message: 2 >Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2015 11:52:02 +0200 >From: Pekka Paalanen < [email protected] > >To: ternaryd < [email protected] > >Cc: [email protected] >Subject: Re: [Nouveau] K2200 Special Setup Question >Message-ID: <20151229115202.61c216c0@farn> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII > >On Tue, 22 Dec 2015 22:50:14 +0100 >ternaryd < [email protected] > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I'm planning to use a K2200 board with an Eizo >> monitor at 10 bits color depth together with a >> standard monitor on a debian sid system. > >Hi, > >I don't know anything about K2200, but I suppose I can give what I >recall from Xorg a few years ago since no-one else replied to you >yet. I am making the assumption that you are talking about setting >up X11 with Xorg. > >> Is it possible to have one monitor with 8, the >> other with 10 bit colors? Is it possible to > >I think so, yes, as long as the different depths are on different >X11 SCREENs, but this has the big caveat that you cannot drag >windows from one monitor to another. > >http://nouveau.freedesktop.org/wiki/MultiMonitorDesktop/ > >If you have a single card with multiple heads, you would be looking >for "Zaphod" options. > >> configure such a setup choosing for each >> monitor a different resolution (dpi) such that >> a window would not change size when moved from >> one monitor to the other? > >"Not changing physical size" is a controversial goal depending on >what exactly you want and how it is achieved. If you are working on >prints and you want to see it 1:1 in physical scale, it is probably >best to calibrate that in the editing program and with a physical >ruler than to rely on any "dpi" numbers from the system. If you are >talking about fonts, "same size" is often contradicting with "good >looking" or even "same looking". In any case on X11, it is up to the >application to resize its window and content accordingly. > >I can look up a few "why dpi is not what you want" related articles >in case you are interested in that side story. > >I have not heard of it being possible to have both differing color >depths and the ability to drag windows from one monitor to another >on X11. > > >Thanks, >pq > > >------------------------------ > >Subject: Digest Footer > >_______________________________________________ >Nouveau mailing list >[email protected] >http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau > > >------------------------------ > >End of Nouveau Digest, Vol 104, Issue 60 >****************************************
_______________________________________________ Nouveau mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau
