Jani Nikula <[email protected]> writes:

> Test not using address deduplication. Incorporate some trivial output
> sorting tests here, as they seem to lack tests.
> ---
>  test/T095-address.sh | 70 
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 70 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/test/T095-address.sh b/test/T095-address.sh
> index 8eecb2a6a7ba..f8d902cb3a5e 100755
> --- a/test/T095-address.sh
> +++ b/test/T095-address.sh
> @@ -145,4 +145,74 @@ cat <<EOF >EXPECTED
>  EOF
>  test_expect_equal_file OUTPUT EXPECTED
>  
> +test_begin_subtest "--deduplicate=no --sort=oldest-first --output=sender"
> +notmuch address --deduplicate=no --sort=oldest-first --output=sender '*' 
> >OUTPUT
> +cat <<EOF >EXPECTED
> +Mikhail Gusarov <[email protected]>
> +Mikhail Gusarov <[email protected]>
> +Carl Worth <[email protected]>

> +
> +test_begin_subtest "--deduplicate=no --sort=newest-first --output=sender 
> --output=recipients"
> +notmuch address --deduplicate=no --sort=newest-first --output=sender 
> --output=recipients path:foo/new >OUTPUT
> +cat <<EOF >EXPECTED
> +Mikhail Gusarov <[email protected]>
> [email protected]
> +Mikhail Gusarov <[email protected]>

Two comments:

1) It's suprising that Mikail is first in both the newest-first and
oldest-first list. Is it easy to explain why?

2) the use of path: term is not mentioned in the description. Should it
be mentioned somehow?

d
_______________________________________________
notmuch mailing list
[email protected]
http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch

Reply via email to