On Sat, 12 Apr 2014, David Bremner <[email protected]> wrote: > [email protected] writes: > >> >> As far as updating the test suite, etc., it's almost certain that the >> core notmuch developers would be unsatisfied with whatever I've done, >> since the code base is very clean and has a very uniform style. So when >> I say I'd want some "indication that such a change could be upstreamed," >> I mean more specifically that someone would be willing to shepherd the >> process of getting the code into shape. >> > > I think it depends on your definition of shepherd. If it means review > your patches and tell you what needs to be done, then we can probably > handle that. Things tend to stall if the patch proposer loses interest > after the first review, so we're pretty far from "fire and forget". > > I'd like to hear one or two more opinions from regular contributors > before I say "yes, this is something we want to do."
FYI everyone, message modification times has been proposed before [1]. BR, Jani. [1] id:[email protected] http://mid.gmane.org/[email protected] _______________________________________________ notmuch mailing list [email protected] http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
