On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 11:40:00 +0000, Mark Walters <[email protected]> wrote: > The reason I went for verbose do-not-exclude was to try and avoid the > double negative ambiguity: does no-exclude mean do-not-exclude or > do-note-return-excluded-messages. Possibly I am worrying needlessly, and > obviously I am quite happy to change.
I also think "no-exclude" or "no-excludes" would be more appropriate. It's not a command that people will likely use that frequently, so as long as it's well documented it will be fine. jamie.
pgpvWeZyQxtNj.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ notmuch mailing list [email protected] http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
