On Wed, 29 Jun 2011 00:47:37 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin <[email protected]> wrote: > > "more robust against leaving daemon's around for some reason", etc. > > Not sure I agree with this.
I'm sorry. I wasn't clear. I wasn't advocating one solution over the other. I was just giving an example of the kind of technical merits on which I would like to see the approaches evaluated. I care about the robustness of the approach here. I'm less inclined to care about the "messiness" of the implementation (however that is measured). If both approaches are equally robust, then I'll take your word for it, and that's great. -Carl -- [email protected]
pgpFrIGbTC0UI.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ notmuch mailing list [email protected] http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
