carloea2 opened a new pull request, #8222: URL: https://github.com/apache/texera/pull/8222
### What changes were proposed in this PR? Insert a newly discovered priority group at the calculated position instead of appending it. This preserves control-before-data ordering regardless of subqueue registration order. ### Any related issues, documentation, discussions? Closes #8221 ### How was this PR tested? ```text python -c "import sys,pytest; sys.path[:0]=[r'<worktree>ambersrcmainpython',r'<main-checkout>ambersrcmainpython']; raise SystemExit(pytest.main([r'amber/src/test/python/core/util/customized_queue/test_linked_blocking_multi_queue.py',r'amber/src/test/python/core/models/test_internal_queue.py','-q','-p','no:cacheprovider']))" 77 passed, 1 xpassed ruff check amber/src/main/python amber/src/test/python All checks passed ruff format --check amber/src/main/python amber/src/test/python 213 files already formatted ``` The direct runtime probe now reports priority order 1, 2 and returns the control message first. ### Was this PR authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling? Generated-by: Codex -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
