aglinxinyuan opened a new pull request, #6266: URL: https://github.com/apache/texera/pull/6266
### What changes were proposed in this PR? Backport of apache/texera#6230 to `release/v1.2`: bumps `psutil` from `5.9.0` to `7.2.2` in `/amber`. `release/v1.2` still pinned `psutil==5.9.0` (a Dependabot security bump on `main`). This applies the same version bump on the release branch: - `amber/requirements.txt`: `psutil==5.9.0` → `psutil==7.2.2` - `amber/LICENSE-binary-python`: sync the direct-dep bullet to `7.2.2` so the binary-license drift check passes. Hand-applied rather than cherry-picked, since #6230 has not merged to `main` yet (no squash commit to `-x`). `psutil` is a self-contained C-extension with no Python dependencies, so no transitive entries change and no full LICENSE-binary regeneration is needed — only the single version bullet. ### Any related issues, documentation, discussions? Backport of apache/texera#6230. ### How was this PR tested? Relies on the existing CI stack selected by the touched files (`amber/*`): `build / pyamber` runs `check_binary_deps.py`, which is the check that enforces direct-dep version agreement between `requirements.txt` and `LICENSE-binary-python`. No `release/*` label is added — this PR *is* the backport. ### Was this PR authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling? Generated-by: Claude Code (Opus 4.8 [1M context]) -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
