cougrimes opened a new issue, #31585:
URL: https://github.com/apache/superset/issues/31585

   ## Screenshot
   
![time_filter](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/bff20571-223c-4fcf-aafb-0e18f4146430)
   
   ## Description
   **Bug: Using the 'Time column' filter for dashboards in conjunction with 
'Sort Filter Values' results in no sorting.
   
   In the screenshot above, I have six different temporal columns in the table. 
Their column names and labels are the following:
   
   | Column Name | Column Label |
   | :--------------- | :--------------- |
   | `lead_created_at` | Lead Created At |
   | `mkto_acquisition_at` | Marketo Acquisition Datetime |
   | `mkto_acquisition_date` | Marketo Acquisition Date |
   |  `lead_updated_at` | Lead Updated At ||
   | `activity_date` | Activity Date |
   | `activity_at` | Activity Timestamp |
   
   When using the Filter Configuration -> Sort filter values option in Add and 
Edit Filters, I would expect one of two behaviors:
   
   * Values sorted would sort on the Column Label
   * Values sorted would sort on the Column Name
   
   However, neither of these behaviors occur; regardless of whether sort is 
applied as ascending or descending, the values do not sort in the picklist.
   
   I have tested this behavior in Superset 4.0.0 and have confirmed across 
multiple deployments.
   
   ## Design input
   I would expect the ideal design pattern here to first sort based on Column 
Label, and if no value is provided, the raw Column Name. 


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to