GitHub user mdedetrich added a comment to the discussion: Replace typesafe 
config for sconfig for Pekko 2.0.0

> @mdedetrich
> 
> 1. Is there a specific bug pekko is facing caused by / in lightbend config?
> 2. Is there a feature missing in lightbend config that pekko desperately 
> needs?
> 
> If both answers are no I would vote for keeping lightbend config.

The thing is there are more factors at play here, for example we have also 
removed [lightbends sslconfig](https://github.com/lightbend/ssl-config) even 
though there wasn't any specific bug and there wasn't any feature that pekko 
desperately needed.

The problem here is that using typesafe config is putting as at risk, because 
if something does happen in the future then we are beholden to lightbend to 
solve it.

GitHub link: 
https://github.com/apache/pekko/discussions/2186#discussioncomment-14362346

----
This is an automatically sent email for notifications@pekko.apache.org.
To unsubscribe, please send an email to: 
notifications-unsubscr...@pekko.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: notifications-unsubscr...@pekko.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: notifications-h...@pekko.apache.org

Reply via email to