GitHub user pjfanning added a comment to the discussion: Why AsyncWriteJournal.Resequencer is needed?
Thanks @migesok for raising this. I'm not aware of why this Resequencer is used. If, as you suggest, the resequencer doesn't seem to affect the results of any tests, maybe, we could add a config setting that allows it to be skipped. My preference, for backward compatibility, is that the Resequencer is used by default. It might be best not to do anything until other contributors have time to provide their opinions or context. Have you tried running any of the tests in modules like pekko-persistence-jdbc? GitHub link: https://github.com/apache/pekko/discussions/1881#discussioncomment-13343107 ---- This is an automatically sent email for notifications@pekko.apache.org. To unsubscribe, please send an email to: notifications-unsubscr...@pekko.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: notifications-unsubscr...@pekko.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: notifications-h...@pekko.apache.org
