ctubbsii commented on PR #5439:
URL: https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/5439#issuecomment-2770341180

   > What made you change your mind on adding `yq` as a dependency?
   
   Did I have a previous opinion that was different? I don't remember changing 
my mind. Perhaps I did. If I did, I think it's because `yq` is a bit more 
ubiquitous now, and I think that I would prefer avoiding setting a precedent 
for coupling accumulo-cluster script stuff that should just be for cluster 
process management (OS-level operations) with Accumulo code (stuff that runs 
inside the JVM). Also, having recently worked on script stuff, and adding a 
simple check for the correct version of getopt in accumulo-cluster has given me 
confidence that we can have the script self-document its dependency in a 
user-friendly way.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to