dlmarion commented on issue #5130: URL: https://github.com/apache/accumulo/issues/5130#issuecomment-2557468896
> This does have the draw back of having multiple threads scanning the same store for the same things, then just filtering them out based on what work they are assigned to take. Maybe this structure could change in a follow on PR if desired, but as an initial PR, using multiple work finders per FATE instance. I'm not sure what the table structure looks like for the USER store, but if the fate operation name is in the colf, then we could set up locality groups for each fate operation in the Initialize and Upgrade code. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
