On 21/09/2013, at 21:24, Andrew Kelley wrote: > You're right. I only tested that the object created had a null __proto__: > > > n = Object.create(null); > undefined > > n.__proto__ > null > > That's nice, but trying to assign a property of __proto__ to it fails: > > > n['__proto__'] = "foo" > 'foo' > > n['__proto__'] > null > > WTF. That's still a problem. Object.create(null) solves nothing. >
See Ben's message, that's currently the best way to workaround the '__proto__' magic property. -- ( Jorge )(); -- -- Job Board: http://jobs.nodejs.org/ Posting guidelines: https://github.com/joyent/node/wiki/Mailing-List-Posting-Guidelines You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "nodejs" group. To post to this group, send email to nodejs@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to nodejs+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nodejs?hl=en?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "nodejs" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to nodejs+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
