Mark,
I think you may not be fully appreciating the terms of the agreement
when you say "it is generally accepted that Intel continues to impair
the optimization on AMD CPU".Under the terms of the agreement (which you
provide below) it is perfectly OK for Intel to optimize their compilers
for Intel CPUs without including any optimization for AMD CPUs.
Furthermore they are not required to provide any optimization for AMD
CPus. Therefore, unless Intel don't know how to optimize compilers you
must expect the Intel compiler to perform better on an Intel CPU.
This issue might (or might not) be relevant to Martin's query about
'differences'. He does not specify the kind of difference e.g. faster?
more accurate?. It may be possible to choose compiler options that
produce identical numerical results on both CPUs but at the price of speed.
Rik Schoemaker suggested using these Intel compiler options /nologo /nbs
/w /Gs /fp:strict to obtain consistent numerical results
(http://www.cognigencorp.com/nonmem/current/2011-May/3266.html) with
different NONMEM 7 versions across different operating systems. Perhaps
these options would ensure numerical consistency across different CPU types.
Best wishes,
Nick
On 13/08/2012 8:27 a.m., Mark Sale - Next Level Solutions wrote:
Martin
Yes, the results can be different. Intel has been accused of
"crippling" the executable when the Intel compiler is used on AMD CPUs
http://www.agner.org/optimize/blog/read.php?i=49
by turning off all optimization - they actually pretty much admitted
this in the lawsuit - but explained that it was for the benefit of the
customer - sort of like in the 1980's when Microsoft pretty much
disabled WordPerfect with every new OS release.
and yes, different optimization setting will give different results,
32 bit will also give different results from 64 bit. Sometimes the
phase of the moon, or the users astrological sign makes a different as
well ;-)
Below is from the settlement:
Intel shall not include any Artificial Performance Impairment in any
Intel product or require any Third Party to include an Artificial
Performance Impairment in the Third Party’s product. As used in this
Section 2.3, “_Artificial Performance Impairment_” means an
affirmative engineering or design action by Intel (but not a failure
to act) that (i) degrades the performance or operation of a Specified
AMD product, (ii) is not a consequence of an Intel Product Benefit and
(iii) is made intentionally to degrade the performance or operation of
a Specified AMD Product. For purposes of this Section 2.3, “_Product
Benefit_” shall mean any benefit, advantage, or improvement in terms
of performance, operation, price, cost, manufacturability,
reliability, compatibility, or ability to operate or enhance the
operation of another product.
In no circumstances shall this Section 2.3 impose or be construed to
impose any obligation on Intel to (i) take any act that would provide
a Product Benefit to any AMD or other non-Intel product, either when
such AMD or non-Intel product is used alone or in combination with any
other product, (ii) optimize any products for Specified AMD Products,
or (iii) provide any technical information, documents, or know how to AMD.
But, it is generally accepted that Intel continues to impair the
optimization on AMD CPU.
So, to answer your question, I don't think there is any way to insure
consistent results between Intel and AMD CPUs.
Mark
Mark Sale MD
President, Next Level Solutions, LLC
www.NextLevelSolns.com <http://www.NextLevelSolns.com>
919-846-9185
A carbon-neutral company
See our real time solar energy production at:
http://enlighten.enphaseenergy.com/public/systems/aSDz2458
--
Nick Holford, Professor Clinical Pharmacology
First World Conference on Pharmacometrics, 5-7 September 2012
Seoul, Korea http://www.go-wcop.org
Dept Pharmacology & Clinical Pharmacology, Bldg 505 Room 202D
University of Auckland,85 Park Rd,Private Bag 92019,Auckland,New Zealand
tel:+64(9)923-6730 fax:+64(9)373-7090 mobile:+64(21)46 23 53
email: n.holf...@auckland.ac.nz
http://www.fmhs.auckland.ac.nz/sms/pharmacology/holford
