Hi Matt,

Thank you very much for your kindly reply. It is very helpful.

I still have another question about this issue. I have tried the first
option. I applied three subgroups on ALPH and two subgroups on BASE. I think
there should be six subgroups in total, right? But in the resulting data,
there are just five subgroups. The code follows,

$PRED

    CALLFL =1
   EST = MIXEST
  IF (MIXNUM.EQ.3) THEN
  ALPH = (THETA(3))
  END IF
  IF (MIXNUM.EQ.2) THEN
  ALPH = (THETA(2))
  END IF
  IF (MIXNUM.EQ.1) THEN
  ALPH = (THETA(1))
  ENDIF


  IF (MIXNUM.EQ.4) THEN
  BASE=THETA(4)
ELSE
 BASE=THETA(5)
END IF



$MIX

    P(1) = THETA(6)
   P(2)=THETA(7)
    P(3) = 1-THETA(7)-THETA(6)
    P(4)=THETA(8)
    P(5)=1-THETA(8)
    NSPOP = 5

Sorry to bother you and thank you very much. I will try that one mentioned
in your mail and let you know the results.
I appreciate your helps.

Best regards,

Kehua

2009/10/13 Fidler,Matt,FORT WORTH,R&D <[email protected]>

>  Kehua,
>
> Option 1 is definitely better.  This states that there is a possibility
> that a population falls into ALPH1 or ALPH2.  Within that same population
> there are two populations for BASE.
>
> The other option states that each person in the has distinct parameters
> that four populations fall into: ALPH - Pop1, ALPH - Pop 2, Base -Pop 1, or
> Base -Pop2.  Therefore, if you selected ALPH - pop1, you wouldn't have the
> parameter base. (You require this by having P1 - P4 to add up to be one -
> the total probability).
>
> A third option you may consider is if you have reason to believe that the
> populations that have ALPH1 and Base1 are the same:
>
> $PRED
>  IF (MIXNUM.EQ.2) THEN
>  ALPH =THETA(1)
> ELSE
>  ALPH = THETA(2)
>  ENDIF
>
>  IF (MIXNUM.EQ.2) THEN
>  BASE=THETA(3)
> ELSE
>  BASE=THETA(4)
> END IF
>
> $MIX
>
>     P(1) = THETA(5)
>     P(2) = 1-THETA(5)
>     NSPOP = 2
>
> I haven't run anything like Option 1, and am unsure if NONMEM supports two
> separate populations for ALPH and BASE.  Has anyone tried this?
>
> Matt.
>
>
>  ------------------------------
> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
> *On Behalf Of *wu kehua
> *Sent:* Tuesday, October 13, 2009 10:58 AM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* [NMusers] a question about the mixture distribution
>
> Hi,
>
> I am a new NONMEM user. I have a question about mixture distribution.
>
> I have two parameters. How to apply mixture distribution on the both
> parameters? I should use the first one or the second one?
>
> *First,*
> $PRED
>  IF (MIXNUM.EQ.2) THEN
>  ALPH =THETA(1)
>  END IF
>  IF (MIXNUM.EQ.1) THEN
>  ALPH = THETA(2)
>  ENDIF
>
>  IF (MIXNUM.EQ.3) THEN
>  BASE=THETA(3)
> ELSE
>  BASE=THETA(4)
> END IF
>
> $MIX
>
>     P(1) = THETA(5)
>     P(2) = 1-THETA(5)
>     P(3)=THETA(6)
>     P(4)=1-THETA6)
>     NSPOP = 4
>
>
> *Second,*
>
>  IF (MIXNUM.EQ.1) THEN
>  ALPH =THETA(1)
>  BASE=THETA(3)
>  END IF
>  IF (MIXNUM.EQ.2) THEN
>  ALPH = THETA(1)
> BASE=THETA(4)
>  ENDIF
>  IF (MIXNUM.EQ.3) THEN
> ALPH = THETA(2)
>  BASE=THETA(3)
> ELSE
> ALPH = THETA(2)
>  BASE=THETA(4)
> END IF
>
> $MIX
>
>     P(1) = THETA(5)
>     P(2) = THETA(6)
>     P(3)=THETA(7)
>     P(4)=1-THETA(5)-THETA(6)-THETA(7)
>     NSPOP = 4
>
> Thank you very much!
>
> Best regards,
>
> Kehua
>
>
>
> This e-mail (including any attachments) is confidential and may be legally
> privileged. If you are not an intended recipient or an authorized
> representative of an intended recipient, you are prohibited from using,
> copying or distributing the information in this e-mail or its attachments.
> If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender
> immediately by return e-mail and delete all copies of this message and any
> attachments.
> Thank you.
>
>

Reply via email to