hello Sergey,
No, I have not.. the reason I've set this number quite high is because I am
expecting a huge amount of packets destined to UDP port 6343.. so I was
just playing with numbers really.
What number would you recommend? Also, why does it work with ipv4?
thanks,
Andre Pedro
Cisco Systems
On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 10:56 AM Sergey A. Osokin <o...@freebsd.org.ru>
wrote:
> Hi Andre,
>
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 07:33:17AM -0400, Andre Pedro wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 10:53 PM Sergey A. Osokin <o...@freebsd.org.ru>
> > wrote:
> > > On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 09:03:21PM -0400, Andre Pedro wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I am trying to get the below load balancer config to work in our
> > > > environment. Basically, this server should receive v6 udp packets
> sflow
> > > > sample packets on port 6343 and forward out to these 3 servers part
> of
> > > > stream_backend. However, it doesn't seem to work. If I switch to v4,
> it
> > > > does work.
> > >
> > > [...]
> > >
> > > > events {
> > > > worker_connections 100000000;
> > > > }
> > >
> > > Could you please provide an explaination about that one.
> > > I'm too curious how did you get that number.
> >
> > I was actually seeing access errors due to the number of connections I
> > guess and then when I changed that, it worked for v4. do you think this
> is
> > related to my problem?
>
> That's quite possible.
>
> > This is just a random(big number) that I've decided on.
>
> Have you tuned any other system resources or parameters to work with such
> a huge number? How many worker processes in that instance?
>
> --
> Sergey A. Osokin
> _______________________________________________
> nginx mailing list -- nginx@nginx.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to nginx-le...@nginx.org
>
_______________________________________________
nginx mailing list -- nginx@nginx.org
To unsubscribe send an email to nginx-le...@nginx.org
