Rate limiting is a useful but crude tool that should only be one if four or five different things you do to protect your backend:
1 browser caching 2 cDN 3 rate limiting 4 nginx caching reverse proxy What are your requests? Are they static content or proxied to a back end? Do users login? Is it valid for dynamic content built for one user to be returned to another? Sent from my iPhone On May 20, 2018, at 4:24 AM, rickGsp <nginx-fo...@forum.nginx.org> wrote: >>> As I tried to explain in my previous message, "test runs for 60 >>> seconds" can have two different meanings: 1) the load is generated >>> for 60 seconds and 2) from first request started to the last >>> request finished it takes 60 seconds. > >>> Make sure you are using the correct meaning. Also, it might >>> be a good idea to look into nginx access logs to verify both time >>> and numbers reported by your tool. > > Yes Maxim, I had understood your point. My test actually ran for 60 to 65 > seconds which means it took 5 additional seconds to process the requests. > Even access logs says the same. Also, on more powerful machine, I get > expected result for the same test i.e 500 req/sec load but start seeing > difference at relatively higher load.It seems to me that a results also > depends on the resources available on the machine running Nginx. > Surprisingly, CPU was not hitting the peak on both the machines.I am using > CentOS systems for this testings. > > Actually in another test with plain HTTP requests, I observed the same issue > of more requests than expected getting processed. However, for HTTP case, > this behaviour appeared at 700 req/sec input load instead of 500 req/sec as > in HTTPS. In this test requests got processed within 60 secs. > > With all the test results, I am being forced to think that Nginx rate > limiting may not be able to stop DDoS attack with very high input load but > is decent enough to handle sudden spikes and load which is slightly higher > than configured rate limit, and computing power available also plays some > role here. Do you think I am right? > > Posted at Nginx Forum: > https://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,279802,279874#msg-279874 > > _______________________________________________ > nginx mailing list > nginx@nginx.org > http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx _______________________________________________ nginx mailing list nginx@nginx.org http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx