> If your current apache configuration serves static files via the php engine, 
> then you're doing something very wrong.
Well, this php-engine is built into apache itself... Anyway, considering only 
this fact, such a bad apache
configuration should not be significantly slower than that of nginx?

> You might or might not see any speed gain depending on your apache 
> configuration, but you should see a big difference in the amount of resources 
> used to serve traffic.
Which ones? And how exactly can I measure this? This also might be a
good point to convince my boss to switch...

> As Valentin mentioned, it's about scalability majority of the time - and that 
> in itself will decrease your costs in hardware or resources that is required 
> to be able to serve your static traffic, and I'm sure whomever you have to 
> prove to, why you should switch from Apache to nginx, would love to see that 
> the cost of running your current setup might decrease to some or to huge 
> extend.
Right now we have a pretty capable dedicated server which costs ca.
40Euro per month and is an overkill for our needs. So for now resources
is not an issue that much...

> 
> If you run wrk as suggested below, you will get a bunch of useful data that 
> will help you chose whichever software solution is the best to use.

Do you think I should stress a production server?

Thank you!


> 
> 
> 
> On 29/06/2017, 19.38, "nginx on behalf of ST" <nginx-boun...@nginx.org on 
> behalf of smn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> >On Thu, 2017-06-29 at 16:16 +0300, Valentin V. Bartenev wrote:
> >> On Thursday 29 June 2017 15:32:21 ST wrote:
> >> > On Thu, 2017-06-29 at 15:09 +0300, Valentin V. Bartenev wrote:
> >> > > On Thursday 29 June 2017 14:00:37 ST wrote:
> >> > > > Hello,
> >> > > > 
> >> > > > with your help I managed to configure nginx and our website now can 
> >> > > > be
> >> > > > accessed both - through apache and nginx.
> >> > > > 
> >> > > > Now, how can I prove to my boss that nginx is more efficient than 
> >> > > > apache
> >> > > > to switch to it? How do I measure its performance and compare it to 
> >> > > > that
> >> > > > of apache? Which tools would you recommend?
> >> > > > 
> >> > > > Thank you in advance!
> >> > > > 
> >> > > 
> >> > > I suggest wrk.
> >> > > 
> >> > > https://github.com/wg/wrk
> >> > > 
> >> > 
> >> > Should I stress our production system with this tool? Our system blocks
> >> > users that make to many requests in a given amount of time...
> >> > Also, how do I prove that static content is now served faster?
> >> > 
> >> > Thank you.
> >> > 
> >> 
> >> Switching from Apache to nginx usually isn't about speed, but about 
> >> scalability.
> >> It's all about how many users/connections you can serve from the same 
> >> hardware.
> >> 
> >
> >Shouldn't it be also about speed, at least for static content, that no
> >longer needs to be served through php-engine? And thus overall loading
> >speed should be higher?
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >nginx mailing list
> >nginx@nginx.org
> >http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
> _______________________________________________
> nginx mailing list
> nginx@nginx.org
> http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx

_______________________________________________
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx

Reply via email to