xD Maxim. I would have put 'hopefully' along with 'surprisingly' though... just to convince myself such dumbness is marginal.
To li...@lazygranch.com, nginx version can already be removed with the help of the server_tokens <http://nginx.org/en/docs/http/ngx_http_core_module.html#server_tokens> directive. Why that is not the default brings back the eternal difficulties around changing defaults, compatbility and stability, debate I (re)initiated around some other 'odd' defaults. Anyway, we are drifting away from the original subject, which is... Oh yeah, stupidity. And next to his lawyer. (And huge font size.) --- *B. R.* On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 9:39 AM, Maxim Konovalov <ma...@nginx.com> wrote: > On 6/3/16 7:33 AM, li...@lazygranch.com wrote: > > Perhaps in a future release of Nginx, the error pages should not > > contain any reference to nginx. That is the only way I can figure > > out this person came up with the idea of complaining to the list. > > (Assuming this isn't spam to encourage use to click on that website > > link.) > > > Actually, a number of such complains is still surprisingly low. > > > I think another mistake is to have the error page indicate the rev > > of nginx. That is an easy way for someone to spot a vulnerable rev > > of the nginx on a server. > > > > -- > Maxim Konovalov > > _______________________________________________ > nginx mailing list > nginx@nginx.org > http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx >
_______________________________________________ nginx mailing list nginx@nginx.org http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
