On 3/1/16 5:23 PM, Jim Ohlstein wrote: > Hello, > > On 3/1/16 8:34 AM, Andrew Hutchings wrote: >> Hi Jim, >> >> On 01/03/16 13:10, Jim Ohlstein wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> On 2/28/16 11:22 PM, Валентин Бартенев wrote: >>>> On Sunday 28 February 2016 08:52:12 meteor8488 wrote: >>>>> Hi All, >>>>> >>>>> I just upgrade Nginx from 1.8 o 1.9 on my FreeBSD box. >>>> [..] >>>>> Did I miss anything in the configuration? or for a busy server, >>>>> it's >>>>> better >>>>> to use accept_mutex instead of reuseport? >>>>> >>>> [..] >>>> >>>> In FreeBSD the SO_REUSEPORT option has completely different >>>> behavior >>>> and shouldn't be enabled in nginx. >>>> >>> >>> Should the configruation option then be disabled or silently >>> ignored in >>> FreeBSD at this time? >> >> It would be difficult to selectively ignore operating systems >> based on >> how this function is supported. Especially if that support changes >> over >> time. > > I don't claim to know how "difficult" that would be, but with all > the extremely talented coders in the Nginx group, I would think that > "difficult" would not be a barrier to "doing it right". If OS > support changes, nginx can change. Something tells me that with a > FreeBSD Core Team member on the Nginx payroll, if this OS feature > changes, it'll filter through to the people who write the code. > Jim, we don't have any FreeBSD core team members on payroll.
-- Maxim Konovalov _______________________________________________ nginx mailing list nginx@nginx.org http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
