On 3/28/2014 1:58 PM, Maxim Dounin wrote: > Nobody care enough to submit a patch. > Likely due to the fact that SNI isn't considered to be an option > for serious SSL-enabled sites anyway due to still limited > client-side support, see here for details: > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Server_Name_Indication#Client_side
Makes sense! And I can live with the SSL warning that results when I employ the method I described a few posts back. Thanks again for your help, everyone! -Ben _______________________________________________ nginx mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
