On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 11:55 PM, momyc <[email protected]> wrote:
> You clearly... err. > Hmmm? > > > 32K simultaneous active connections to the same service on a single > machine? I suspect the bottleneck is somewhere else... > > I don't know what exactly "service" means in context of our conversation > but > if that means server then I did not say that everything should be handled > by > single FastCGI server. I said single Nginx server can easily dispatch > thousands of HTTP requests to a number of remote FastCGI backends. > ... and I haven't seen a clue indicating that multiplexing would be as useful in practice as it is claimed to be in theory. > > > I am no among the developers at all > > That's what I thought. > Well. You must be an expert on the matter. I'll probably be enlightened reading whatever follows. .. :o) Developer omniscience? I am done here. --- *B. R.*
_______________________________________________ nginx mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
