Hi,
Thanks again for your time, Maxim. And you're right,
I was assuming max-age=0 in all its forms to be equivalent
to no such header at all. I have a simple fix which I'll
post in a moment and then go ahead with adding a
relevant test case. Just let me know if I'm completely
on a wrong track here.
Best regards,
Thorvaldur
On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 4:52 PM, Maxim Dounin <mdou...@mdounin.ru> wrote:
> Hello!
>
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 03:37:27PM +0100, Thorvaldur Thorvaldsson wrote:
>
>> # HG changeset patch
>> # User Thorvaldur Thorvaldsson <thorvaldur.thorvalds...@gmail.com>
>> # Date 1450190015 -3600
>> # Tue Dec 15 15:33:35 2015 +0100
>> # Node ID 2c1f00c7f857c12587f0ac47323f04c6a881843a
>> # Parent def9c9c9ae05cfa7467b0ec96e76afa180c23dfb
>> Upstream: Cache stale responses if they may be revalidated.
>>
>> Previously, the proxy cache would never store stale responses, e.g.,
>> when the "Cache-Control" header contained "max-age=0", even if the
>> "proxy_cache_revalidate" directive was "on" and the response included
>> both an "ETag" and a "Last-Modified" header. This came as a surprise.
>>
>> Now, a header like "Cache-Control: max-age=0, must-revalidate" can be
>> used along with an ETag/Last-Modified header to make nginx cache
>> responses that always require revalidation, e.g., when authorization is
>> required (and cheap).
>
> [...]
>
>> diff -r def9c9c9ae05 -r 2c1f00c7f857 src/http/ngx_http_upstream.c
>> --- a/src/http/ngx_http_upstream.c Sat Dec 12 10:32:58 2015 +0300
>> +++ b/src/http/ngx_http_upstream.c Tue Dec 15 15:33:35 2015 +0100
>> @@ -2815,11 +2815,16 @@
>> valid = ngx_http_file_cache_valid(u->conf->cache_valid,
>> u->headers_in.status_n);
>> if (valid) {
>> - r->cache->valid_sec = now + valid;
>> + valid += now;
>> + r->cache->valid_sec = valid;
>> }
>> }
>>
>> - if (valid) {
>> + if (valid > now
>> + || (r->upstream->conf->cache_revalidate
>> + && (u->headers_in.etag
>> + || u->headers_in.last_modified_time != -1)))
>> + {
>> r->cache->date = now;
>> r->cache->body_start = (u_short) (u->buffer.pos -
>> u->buffer.start);
>
> As far as I see, this still allows caching of all
> responses, even ones without Cache-Control/Expires/X-Accel-Expires
> and proxy_cache_valid configured. This is not something that
> should happen because of revalidation enabled.
>
> You may want to rethink how the patch is expected to work.
>
> [...]
>
> --
> Maxim Dounin
> http://nginx.org/
>
> _______________________________________________
> nginx-devel mailing list
> nginx-devel@nginx.org
> http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx-devel
_______________________________________________
nginx-devel mailing list
nginx-devel@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx-devel
