On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 12:16:59PM -0800, agentzh wrote: > On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 12:13 AM, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > > > While the first patch looks more natural to me, the second patch is > > in line with the ngx_epoll_process_events() code. > > > > Yes, your patch is more reasonable :)
http://trac.nginx.org/nginx/changeset/5017/nginx _______________________________________________ nginx-devel mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx-devel
