Hello, Thank you for nfdump project, it's great work! But I encountered problem with Juniper IPFIX implementation. In my case, there are one template and one options template. The problem is, that switch assign separate sequence number counter for data replying to template and options template. So this situation nfdump handle as packet loss. I'm not sure if it ok to have separate sequence counter for data packet with different flow set. Is this behavior correspond to RFC or it just Juniper realization? And could you recommend how to gracefully handle this problem? First solution i see, is to bound sequence number and template id. But that would make a problem in case of switch which have one sequence counter for each data flow set.
Sincerely Dmirty Kasyanov ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Dive into the World of Parallel Programming. The Go Parallel Website, sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/ _______________________________________________ Nfdump-discuss mailing list Nfdump-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfdump-discuss
