Guy Holder
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/guy-holder-4596854a_i-dont-think-i-have-heard-such-a-naked-exposition-share-7454225899031269376-oqBA
I don’t think I have heard such a naked exposition of the centrality of
surveillance capitalism to the development of OpenAI than this 54 second
clip from Sam Altman (link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=efSpDL0hZzM):
“These models are still quite dumb, relative to what they will be,
but, more than that, they have quite limited awareness of your life,
you are still having to, like, massage them and cajole them, to try
and get the thing that you want.
We are no longer that far away from a model that just knows all of
your contacts, it knows about you, it knows about your life, it
knows what your doing, it knows what you care about, it knows about
the people in your life, it has access to your computer and your
browser (if you want, of course) and it has access, maybe
increasingly over time, to what is going on in the real world around
you.
That is going to be a complete change to what it feels like to use a
computer, and what it feels like to use AI, and I am tremendously
excited about that. But I don’t think even we have a good intuition
yet for what that’s really going to feel like”
.........
To successfully develop their product, and to have it perform to its
optimum potential, everything must be known. Everything. Virtually and
‘in real life’. Everything. It is there, above, in black and white. It
is on the tape.
As Shoshana Zuboff wrote in her seminal book 'Surveillance Capitalism,
there is no end to the drive for data, other than totality.
Where does this leave education, with regards to being protected from
this vision of AI extractivism? Linked, and even more importantly, where
does it leave the rights of children?
Sitting ducks, I would say.
As*Karen Hao* <https://www.linkedin.com/in/karendhao/>writes, the push
for data disproportionately falls on “already vulnerable populations,
including children”.
We have to resist this.
