On 2 Jan 2022 as I do recall,
Andrew Hodgkinson wrote:
> On 3 Jan 2022, at 6:44, Harriet Bazley wrote:
>
> > How are these images supposed to work?
> >
> > [https://www.phantomlibrary.com/macabre-mystery-curse-of-the-nightingal](https://www.phantomlibrary.com/macabre-mystery-curse-of-the-nightingal)
[snip]
> They built a very over-complicated JavaScript system, that uses a custom
> element wrapping a standard IMG tag in the hope that a browser will
> ignore the outer custom element but render whatever it wraps. So, the
> browser renders the standard `img` tag, which contains a low resolution
> blurred preview of the actual image. JavaScript code looks for the
> custom `wix-image` elements and parses parameters in the various `data`
> attributes to work out how it's supposed to load and show the full
> resolution image to the user.
>
Thanks. At least in this case there is a way in which one *can* view
the missing images via some source-diving if they appear to be relevant
to the body text - more and more sites on the Web seem to be showing up
with their photos missing, presumably due to similar just-in-time JS
loading techniques.
--
Harriet Bazley == Loyaulte me lie ==
I like work; it fascinates me; I can sit and look at it for hours.
_______________________________________________
netsurf-users mailing list -- netsurf-users@netsurf-browser.org
To unsubscribe send an email to netsurf-users-le...@netsurf-browser.org
