In article <534d633ccb...@timil.com>, Tim Hill <t...@timil.com> wrote:
> Site: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/ > Build #1177: 13.0s > Build #1178: 13.7s > Build #1179: 22.6s > Site: http://slashdot.org/ > Build #1177: 8.5s > Build #1178: 8.4s > Build #1179: 25.0s The #1179 results are odd. Was that with JavaScript on, or with the computer busy doing something else? -- Michael Drake (tlsa) http://www.netsurf-browser.org/
