On 6 May 2013, Andrew Pinder <andrew.pin...@tiscali.co.uk> wrote: > In message <3c58a64753.old_coaster@old_coaster.yahoo.co.uk> > on 6 May 2013 Tony Moore <old_coas...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: >> > > On 1 May 2013, Chris Young > > > <chris.yo...@unsatisfactorysoftware.co.uk> wrote: > > > [snip] > > > > > I think it is highly likely that NetSurf 3.0 has been built > > > > without JavaScript support. > > > At present, both > > http://www.riscosopen.org/forum/forums/1/topics/1847 and the > > ChangeLog assert that NetSurf 3.0 offers 'early and primitive > > JavaScript support'. However, it would appear that this is untrue. > > > Is it intended to rebuild NetSurf 3.0 and/or alter the ChangeLog so > > that they are mutually consistent? > > If you go to http://ci.netsurf-browser.org/builds/riscos/ you will > find that the first half of the listed builds are "-jsoff-" and the > second half are "-json-"
I'm aware of that - thank you. The point is that some people choose to use the stable releases, instead of the development builds. This discussion had its origin in a post to csa.apps by someone who had downloaded NetSurf 3.0 and was 'having some difficulty with its JS'. Tony
