In message <ae9c0b0201f.00000e9fd...@davehigton.me.uk>
          Dave Higton <d...@davehigton.me.uk> wrote:

>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: george.greenfi...@tiscali.co.uk
>> Sent: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 09:20:59 GMT
>> To: netsurf-users@netsurf-browser.org
>> Subject: Thetrainline.com crashes CI #744
>> 
>> Made three consecutive attempts to access Thetrainline.com using NS CI
>> #744 with javascript enabled, each resulting in a NS crash and exit.
>> Attempting to access the bug tracker and file a bug report crashed
>> #744 again! Back to 2.9 for the bug report....
> 
> I found that disabling Javascript on 744 enabled me to submit my
> bug report (with file), which is easier than uninstalling etc.
> 
> The quick smoke tests I've done with 744 with JS disabled don't show
> any worse stability than versions prior to JS.
> 
> There are also non-JS CI builds, if you prefer.

Don't get me wrong: I intended no criticism of JS-enabled NetSurf, in 
fact I think it's splendid, and to be supported in every way, 
including the submission of bug reports where appropriate. It was just 
a bit ironic that the bug tracker itself was amongst the casualties!

George

-- 
george greenfield

Reply via email to