Tim Hill <t...@timil.com> wrote:
> In article <b31936b351.kbar...@orpheusnet.co.uk>, Erving > <erv...@riscos.org> wrote: > > From: Brian Bailey <bbai...@argonet.co.uk> Date: 12 Mar 2011 > > > > In article <mpro.lhxxmn00000y307vp.n...@pittdj.co.uk>, David Pitt > > > <n...@pittdj.co.uk> wrote: > > > > > > > snip > > > > > Like this?? > > > > > > > http://www.a4com.de/riscos/46auto/Medium/P9271641.JIG > > ^ > > ^^^ > >I wonder how this got changed? It took me ages to spot why > >this link did not work, so easy to see what you expect, not > >what is actually there! > > I know exactly how. JPG is not in Brian Bailey's Pluto spell check dict. > Perhaps next time he needs to add JPG to his dictionary instead of just > hitting return and taking whatever alteration the program suggests! > > Mangled URLs are not uncommon. Going back to the Original posting often > sorts it. > Yes I did that, it was after that that it took me so long to spot why one worked and the other didn't, as I just read JIG as JPG . I even dropped the two lines into Piperdream (in cells A1 and A2) and asked if they matched, which it said they did. I later found I had asked it to compare C1 and C2. I even did a hex dump of the strings in case there was some hidden difference, while I was checking this my friend looking over my shoulder spotted it almost at once (she started from the RH end). -- Erving