On 7 Jan 2011, Steve Fryatt wrote: > On 7 Jan, Roger Darlington wrote in message > <dfd5f29151.roger...@rogerarm.freeuk.com>:
>> I can grab the URL of this page using Netsurf and save it as an ANT URL: >> >> [A Very Long URL] >> >> But if I then click on the saved URL in Netsurf it will not re-load the >> page. > Could you clarify what "click on the saved URL in NetSurf" means, please? > Do you actually mean that you double-click on it in a filer window while > NetSurf is on the iconbar? Yes, the latter. >> The following error is issued by the URL: >> >> Sorry, your request could not be processed because the format of the URL >> was incorrect. Contact the Help Desk if the problem persists. [SD-001] >> >> Looking at the URL in Netsurf, it is end-truncated. > I think you're actually conflating two different issues. The URL in the > toolbar is indeed truncated to 255 characters[1], *but* if you check the > logfile, you'll see that NetSurf is actually fetching the full URL that you > quote above[2]. > Given that Firefox also reports that the URL above is malformed, I'd suggest > that the problem lies in the *saving*, and not the loading of the bookmark. > What should the URL actually be? That I have no Idea Steve. I would have to try and remember the search terms I used in Google ('Alkaloids Yucca Gloriosa', I think), and hope I can find the same reference.... [20 mins] Nope I am unable to find the same page again despite feeding Google further clues that are in the part of the URL that I can see. I have just spent another 10 minutes looking for Netsurfs logfile without finding it (either in its own !Netsurf directories, or in the Choices file). It must be somewhere, but I can't remember how to look at it without first making it crash. Would it be a good idea if 'mouse Menu button over Netsurfs icon on icon bar' gave a 'Open > Show logfile' option? > 1. That's because on RISC OS, the toolbar's URL bar only allocates 256 bytes > to store the URL and terminator in. I'm afraid that I'm not immediately > about to fix that, because I'm already working on that code in other ways at > present. OK. Your doing a sterling job Steve. > 2. There is a hardcoded limit of 399 bytes for an ANT URL file's contents, > but you haven't (quite) hit that with your address. I'm sure I can come across a longer one given time ;-) -- Cheers Roger Teetering on the drink...