On 7 Jan 2011, Steve Fryatt  wrote:
> On 7 Jan, Roger Darlington wrote in message
>     <dfd5f29151.roger...@rogerarm.freeuk.com>:

>> I can grab the URL of this page using Netsurf and save it as an ANT URL:
>> 
>> [A Very Long URL]
>> 
>> But if I then click on the saved URL in Netsurf  it will not re-load the
>> page.

> Could you clarify what "click on the saved URL in NetSurf" means, please?
> Do you actually mean that you double-click on it in a filer window while
> NetSurf is on the iconbar?

Yes, the latter.

>> The following error is issued by the URL:
>> 
>> Sorry, your request could not be processed because the format of the URL
>> was incorrect. Contact the Help Desk if the problem persists. [SD-001]
>> 
>> Looking at the URL in Netsurf, it is end-truncated.

> I think you're actually conflating two different issues.  The URL in the
> toolbar is indeed truncated to 255 characters[1], *but* if you check the
> logfile, you'll see that NetSurf is actually fetching the full URL that you
> quote above[2].

> Given that Firefox also reports that the URL above is malformed, I'd suggest
> that the problem lies in the *saving*, and not the loading of the bookmark.


> What should the URL actually be?
That I  have no Idea Steve. I would have to try and remember the 
search terms I used in Google ('Alkaloids Yucca Gloriosa', I think), 
and hope I can find the same reference....

[20 mins]

Nope I am unable to find the same page again despite feeding Google 
further clues that are in the part of the URL that I can see.

I have just spent another 10 minutes looking for Netsurfs logfile 
without finding it (either in its own !Netsurf directories, or in the 
Choices file). It must be somewhere, but I can't remember how to look 
at it without first making it crash.

Would it be a good idea if 'mouse Menu button over Netsurfs icon on 
icon bar' gave a 'Open > Show logfile' option?


> 1. That's because on RISC OS, the toolbar's URL bar only allocates 256 bytes
> to store the URL and terminator in.  I'm afraid that I'm not immediately
> about to fix that, because I'm already working on that code in other ways at
> present.


OK. Your doing a sterling job Steve.

> 2. There is a hardcoded limit of 399 bytes for an ANT URL file's contents,
> but you haven't (quite) hit that with your address.

I'm sure I can come across a longer one given time ;-)



-- 

Cheers
Roger
Teetering on the drink...

Reply via email to