In article <mpro.ldjkj3078sxjk01c1.li...@stevefryatt.org.uk>, Steve Fryatt <li...@stevefryatt.org.uk> wrote: > > If you're not a programmer, then consider contacting Steve Fryatt and > > persuading him of your correctness.
> Not much persuasion necessary: this has niggled me for ages, too. :-) > r11081 tries to use a "modified moving average", which if I remember my > maths correctly, comes up with an average value weighted to the more > recent samples. There are probably all manner of holes that can be > picked regarding the fact that the sample points aren't equally spaced, > but the result looks fairly sane on the downloads I've tried and it has > the advantage of not needing to store and process loads of data on each > update. Thank you very much for this. I hadn't realised that it was a RISC OS problem; I had assumed that it applied to every version of Netsurf. -- David Wild using RISC OS on broadband www.davidhwild.me.uk
