On 26 Apr 2010 Rob Kendrick wrote: > On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 10:52:42 +0100 > Richard Porter <r...@minijem.plus.com> wrote:
>> Whether or not RISC OS's memory management is dreadful, most tasks >> seem to cope with it. > Most tasks are not handling data structures anywhere near as complex as > NetSurf is. The only other that springs to mind is Firefox, and I think > we'll all agree that NetSurf is far more frugal. Firefox isn't really viable on a RiscPC, but NetSurf didn't have this problem until around August last year. The 21st July version (r8643) is better behaved as regards memory utilisation. -- Richard Porter http://www.minijem.plus.com/ mailto:r...@minijem.plus.com Confidentiality statement: Imagine 50 lines of pointless verbiage.
