On 6 Dec 2008 Rob Kendrick wrote: > Please note everybody that I said that validators serve no purpose in > the development of web browsers. You and others appear to be confusing > this with the development of web sites.
I think I made precisely that distinction. > A browser that cannot render broken HTML is not a useful thing, given > the vast majority of sites are broken. Thus, knowing that sites are > broken is not useful. But knowing how they are broken is, and so is knowing how mainstream browsers deal with the same faults. Knowing that a site is valid is also useful, since a browser must correctly render compliant sites. -- _ |_|. _ Richard Porter http://www.minijem.plus.com/ |\_||_ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Disclaimer: I disclaim everything.
