I thought as of now its the business demand that drives the priority for the blueprints and features. I guess the problem is companies ( like HP and Internap ) have not played a lot around quantum yet. So, we haven't got their feedbacks/comments/needs. If there are some HP and Internap folks here, please correct me if this is wrong.
Deepak On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 9:48 AM, Sumit Naiksatam (snaiksat) <snaik...@cisco.com> wrote: > Hi Deepak, and All, > > I feel this is very good dimension to factor in while prioritizing which > tasks to take up for Folsom - what are the consumers of the Quantum service > asking for? Not to say that any, or all of what has already been mentioned in > this thread is not driven by requirements; I am sure everything is very well > thought out and merits consideration. But just trying to make a point that it > would be nice to hear more from current/potential Quantum users as to what > their burning needs are (probably restating the obvious, and pardon me! :-)). > > Thanks, > ~Sumit. > > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: netstack-bounces+snaiksat=cisco....@lists.launchpad.net >> [mailto:netstack-bounces+snaiksat=cisco....@lists.launchpad.net] On >> Behalf Of Deepak Garg >> Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2012 8:09 PM >> To: Edgar Magana (eperdomo) >> Cc: netstack@lists.launchpad.net >> Subject: Re: [Netstack] quantum community projects & folsom summit >> plans >> >> HI All, >> >> I didn't find IPv6 support in Dan's list of community and shiny >> projects. >> >> a. Do we have complete IPv6 support -> all features working well in >> IPv6 with appropriate tests written for the same ? >> b. If not where does it lie in the priority list ? >> >> I know that there is some demand for IPv6 in the cloud industry. >> >> >> Deepak >> >> >> >> >> On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 2:06 AM, Edgar Magana (eperdomo) >> <eperd...@cisco.com> wrote: >> > Hi Folks, >> > >> > >> > >> > Last summit we presented a session about Network Services Insertion >> were the >> > community supported the fact of having some orchestration mechanisms >> to >> > incorporate L2 services within Quantum. In Essex our team implemented >> a >> > library to insert "In-path" network services under the Cisco PlugIn >> > (quantum/plugins/cisco/services). We would like to extend this >> > implementation covering the following aspects: >> > >> > >> > >> > - Service insertion utility supporting all available PlugIns >> and >> > coming L3 features >> > >> > - Moving the code from Quantum Server to Quantum Client >> > >> > - Include "Out of path" network services (It could include >> some L3 >> > functionality or not and that is the part that we would like to >> discuss) >> > >> > - Any open ideas from the community. >> > >> > - Removing the DB dependency (or not?) >> > >> > >> > >> > I already registered a brainstorming session to go over this points >> and find >> > out if the community is interested on this and how we can include >> more >> > available open services. >> > >> > This is the link of the proposal: >> > http://wiki.openstack.org/QuantumServicesInsertion >> > >> > >> > >> > I would like to hear your points of view about this and hopefully >> have a >> > great discussion during the summit if that is the case. >> > >> > >> > >> > Thanks, >> > >> > >> > >> > Edgar >> > >> > >> > >> > From: netstack-bounces+eperdomo=cisco....@lists.launchpad.net >> > [mailto:netstack-bounces+eperdomo=cisco....@lists.launchpad.net] On >> Behalf >> > Of Dan Wendlandt >> > Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2012 11:52 AM >> > To: hitesh wadekar >> > Cc: netstack@lists.launchpad.net >> > Subject: Re: [Netstack] quantum community projects & folsom summit >> plans >> > >> > >> > >> > Hi folks, I'd like to see some more responses to this thread, so we >> can make >> > sure that we as a community collectively decide on what are the most >> > important topics to cover at the summit. Having buy-in from the >> whole team >> > is important, as we'll really need to focus our resources to >> accomplish what >> > we need to do to become core in Folsom. Thanks! >> > >> > >> > >> > Dan >> > >> > On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 6:19 PM, hitesh wadekar >> <hitesh.wade...@gmail.com> >> > wrote: >> > >> > Hi Dan, >> > >> > I completely agree with Salvatore comments on (Quantum has an awful >> lot of >> > potential, but to put in Dell's Rob Hirschfeld words: "potential >> means >> > you've got to keep working on it." (see his post on Quantum: >> > http://robhirschfeld.com/2012/02/08/quantum-network-virtualization- >> in-the-openstack-essex-release-2/)) >> > >> > I would like to join NetStack team for fixing bugs and community >> projects >> > >> > As I am new to Quantum, hence I will start first to fix low hanging >> fruit >> > bugs. so that I will be acclimatized Quantum environment. once I >> build a >> > rapo then I will fully involve in you listed community projects. >> > >> > >> > Along this I would like to explore OVS and feature enhancement for it >> in >> > Quantum-plug in and agent. While installing Quantum using DevStack I >> have >> > been encountering with OVS packaging issue for Ubuntu oneiric and >> this is >> > the existing bugs reported on Ubuntu launchpad. I feel we should >> handle such >> > issues in DevStack. >> > >> > Quantum is truly networking project, while working on this, I am 100% >> sure >> > that I will be enjoying to brush up and improve my networking skills. >> > >> > Thanks all for support. I am looking forward to guidance and >> encourage from >> > Netstack as well as OpenStack community. >> > >> > I am looking forward challenging and excitement work from Folsom. >> > >> > Thanks Dan and NetStacker, >> > Hitesh Wadekar >> > >> > On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Dan Wendlandt <d...@nicira.com> >> wrote: >> > >> > Hi team, >> > >> > >> > >> > As we start to look forward to Folsom, I know there will be a lot of >> > excitement around shiny new directions we can take Quantum (L3, >> VPN/DCI, >> > etc.). This is great, and we will be moving in this direction during >> > Folsom. I know many people are looking to participate here. >> > >> > >> > >> > But I also want to stress the importance of also focusing on less >> shiny >> > tasks that are central to building a solid and usable platform. To >> this >> > end, I wanted to highlight a link I sent out during last weeks >> > meeting: http://wiki.openstack.org/QuantumStarterBugs >> > >> > >> > >> > This page has a pointer to low-hanging fruit bugs as well as a list >> of >> > "community projects" that are not necessarily shiny, but are critical >> to the >> > progress of the project. This includes things like improving the >> CLI, >> > integrating with Horizon/Keystone, building a system test >> infrastructure, >> > updating documentation, multi-host devstack, etc. >> > >> > >> > >> > In many cases, these are items that we targeted for Essex, but didn't >> have >> > sufficient core dev resources to tackle. With Quantum becoming core >> in >> > Folsom, we can't afford to have that happen again, as expectations >> around >> > Quantums usability, robustness and integration with other projects >> will be >> > much higher in Folsom than it was for Essex. >> > >> > >> > >> > I encourage others to add items to this page as well. My general >> rule is >> > that something is a community project if its unlikely that someone is >> doing >> > the work to enable something for their platform/company. As a hint, >> if a >> > bunch of people who express interesting in working on something, its >> > probably not a community project. If people have been saying "hey, >> someone >> > should really fix/improve X" for a while, the fix would help just >> about >> > everyone, but no one has yet stepped forward, its probably a >> community >> > project :) >> > >> > >> > >> > So in sum, as an open source project, we must make sure everyone is >> > encouraged and rewarded for working on core community projects. I >> also want >> > to make sure sufficient time at the summit is dedicated to how we >> will >> > progress on both community projects. >> > >> > >> > >> > Since we will soon be able to register sessions for the Folsom >> summits, I'd >> > like people to chime in on the list for what they think are the most >> > important "community projects", as well as "shiny objects" for us to >> discuss >> > at the summit. Hopefully this will make the process of designing >> sessions >> > more collaborative and community-driver, rather than a game of "I >> better try >> > and register the session on X before someone else does". >> > >> > >> > >> > Here are some initial thoughts: >> > >> > >> > >> > community projects: >> > >> > - improve system test / devstack / tempest >> > >> > - quantum authn + authz (yes, we still do not have basic API auth) >> > >> > - better integration with openstack CI team (we want automated >> smoketests to >> > run on each check-in) >> > >> > - quantum CLI / client improvements. (many changes needed to be more >> inline >> > with other core projects) >> > >> > - reworking of quantum / nova integration (remove dependence on nova >> db, >> > etc.) >> > >> > - better model for learning what extensions are supported by the >> currently >> > running plugin. >> > >> > - quantum + horizon GUI flow (and framework for widgets that use API >> > extensions). >> > >> > - melange / quantum integration >> > >> > - DHCP API / service >> > >> > >> > >> > shiny objects: >> > >> > - L3 API >> > >> > - VPN / data-center-interconnect >> > >> > - firewalling / security groups. >> > >> > >> > >> > Please reply with your own input. Thanks, >> > >> > >> > >> > Dan >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~netstack >> > Post to : netstack@lists.launchpad.net >> > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~netstack >> > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> > Dan Wendlandt >> > >> > Nicira Networks: www.nicira.com >> > >> > twitter: danwendlandt >> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~netstack >> > Post to : netstack@lists.launchpad.net >> > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~netstack >> > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Deepak Garg, >> Data Center and Cloud Div. >> Citrix R&D, India >> Skype-id: deepakgarg.iit >> >> -- >> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~netstack >> Post to : netstack@lists.launchpad.net >> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~netstack >> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp -- Deepak Garg, Data Center and Cloud Div. Citrix R&D, India Skype-id: deepakgarg.iit -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~netstack Post to : netstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~netstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
