Hello Yamahata, I apologize for not replying earlier. We've been dealing with some high-priority bugs in Quantum Manager lately, which have distracted us a bit from reviews. I am confident we can get this into Essex-4 though.
I share your concern about overlapping plugin functionality. Ideally I think we should seek to make libraries that allow different plugins to share common code. I believe your new patch should be a great step in that direction. I'm hoping to review this new patch and provide feedback by tomorrow (Wed.) U.S. time. Once I do that, I think I'll have a better idea of what code can be shared (I'm also going to be reviewing the bridge plugin shortly). Thanks again for this contribution, its great to see more people contributing plugins to Quantum! Dan On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 7:33 PM, Isaku Yamahata <yamah...@valinux.co.jp> wrote: > Hi. When I requested Ryu plugin merge, > https://review.openstack.org/#change,3618 > I noticed that others also has tries to introduce a new plugin, > Linux bridge plugin. > https://review.openstack.org/#change,3278 > > After those two plugins are merged, we'll have very similar three quantum > agents. I think it's ok in short term, but how should we do in long term? > Refactor those and introduce something like agent-common package and > each agent packages? Or do nothing because the original intention > seems that agent program should be a small independent program and it > should be easy to install it. > > > thanks, > -- > yamahata -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dan Wendlandt Nicira Networks: www.nicira.com twitter: danwendlandt ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~netstack Post to : netstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~netstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
